"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten,
every picture has been repainted,
every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered.
And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute.
History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present
in which the Party is always right." - George Orwell, 1984
See, I think it's quite possible that the 1960's represented the last burst
of the human being before he was extinguished
and that this is the beginning of the rest of the future now,
and from now on, there'll simply be all these robots walking around,
feeling nothing, thinking nothing.
And there'll be nobody left almost to remind them
that there once was a species called a human being,
with feelings and thoughts,
and that history and memory are right now being erased,
and soon nobody will really remember that life existed on the planet.
AFTERMATH
- We didn't fight against you. - Just against the Russians?
To be exact, not against the Russians, but against Bolshevism.
- They were people like you and I. - Against Stalinist Bolshevism.
We defended our country against it, and more importantly, all of Europe.
If we hadn't stopped it, it would have reached your country and France, too.
Right up to the channel. That was their plan.
We also had to fight the Americans, when they landed.
In France, Italy and Africa.
In the end, the Russians sometimes outnumbered us twelve to one.
And we still tried to keep them away from the borders of the Reich.
To defend our people.
The Russian didn't sign the Geneva Convention.
He didn't need to respect international conventions of war, and he showed it.
Stirred up by Bolshevist propaganda, he massacred our people...
and also molested them, in particular the women.
We tried to prevent that until the end. We didn't succeed.
German soldiers didn't do that. Maybe. But it was strictly forbidden.
I think…
- What do you mean? - Rape. The Russians did that.
- The Germans didn't do that? - No.
It is something you always hear, but the Wehrmacht didn't do that.
You couldn't. You'd be shot or sent to a punishment battalion.
Yet bad things happened between the Wehrmacht and the population.
In the Netherlands? Where?
In Putten. The village I'm from. The Wehrmacht surrounded it...
and deported the men to labor camps in Germany.
More than 600 men were deported and only 49 returned.
Is there evidence of that?
Yes, they never came back. My great-uncles died as well.
The Wehrmacht did that? I don't believe that.
The Wehrmacht had nothing to do with labor allocation.
Maybe it was the police.
A German car had been ambushed near the village, but it wasn't clear…
So that's why. There was always a cause for such a fierce reaction.
But it was a violation of the conventions of war.
But if those who had ambushed that car had been partisans, noncombatants...
then they'd violated the conventions of war as well. Or were they soldiers?
- No, resistance fighters. - There you go. Partisans.
That was the cause. It was a reaction to the car being attacked by partisans.
But the first crime was the invasion of the Netherlands. We didn't start it.
That's right, we marched in...
We marched in without asking permission.
The Wehrmacht should have asked if we could march into the Netherlands.
- Or declared war. - No one would have given permission.
War has its own laws.
I grew up just as every other American looking back at World War II
of which my father was a veteran, in fact,
of the Normandy invasion, D-day plus two.
I looked back on with other Americans with great pride
at what Americans were able to do and to liberate Europe and so on.
However, I don't feel the same way about that war anymore
and I'm convinced that if my father was still living,
that he would also greatly question what he had actually participated in.
Again, the Soviet Union was manipulating the American war effort,
and the British war effort as well,
in order to defeat Hitler, to supplant him with Stalin,
and this is exactly what happened.
The logic of the map is what tells us that what I'm saying has credence,
because when you look at that post-war map, what happened,
there is a devastated Germany and in that vacuum
there is a new thriving, powerful US-supplied Soviet empire in its place.
World War II was the crossroads of human history.
It was a battle of two opposing ideologies, philosophies and worldviews.
It was a battle between nationalism and globalism.
It was a war between Germany and the Jewish powers
who controlled the allied governments and their media.
Adolf Hitler and his allies fought to preserve the concept of nationalism,
not just for Germans, but for all peoples the world over.
The world that we're living in today is the world of the victors of that war.
This is the world of globalism, capitalism and communism.
The outcome of World War II decided the fate of our civilization.
Countries did not lose the Second World War, but humanity as a whole.
Over 60 million people died in the most horrific war in human history.
After Germany's defeat,
Europe was placed back again on the heel of the bankers
where it remains to this day.
The old debt payments originating from the post Treaty of Versailles
was reinstituted in 1948, and was not paid off until 2010.
Germany is now totally controlled
by the Rothschild, Goldman Sachs and the Federal Reserve.
These same forces of international Jewry are the very same
about which Adolf Hitler tried to forewarn the German people.
All of Germany's gold reserves
are now held in the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Today, the German people find themselves
in the same state of economic servitude of which Hitler tried to correct.
Germany is still paying off war reparations for World War II.
On the 23rd of May, 1949,
the Western Allies ratified a new German constitution
known as "The Basic Law", Grundgesetz.
Two days prior,
a secret state treaty, Geheimer Staatsvertrag, was also signed.
This granted complete allied control over education and all licensed media,
press, radio, television and publishing houses until the year 2099.
Germany is still an occupied land
with over 100,000 foreign troops stationed on her soil
and the Jews have never made peace with her.
No peace treaty has been concluded with any of the Allied powers.
Free speech and freedom of thought is gone,
not only in Germany, but in most parts of Europe.
The Jew Martin Schulz, president of the European Parliament, explained:
"The new Germany exists only in order to ensure
the existence of the State of Israel and the Jewish people."
There you have World War II in one quote.
That was what the war was all about.
Breaking down Germany and making her a milking cow to the bankers again.
The globalist United Nations
began with the London declaration, 12th of June, 1941.
The name United Nations was coined by Franklin Roosevelt
and was used during the Declaration by United Nations of January 1942.
On June 26, 1945, The founding Charter for the United Nations was signed.
At the founding San Francisco conference that established the United Nations,
the U.S. official serving as Secretary General
was the communist agent Alger Hiss who was exposed as a Soviet spy in 1948.
The UN replaced the globalist League of Nations
as the foundation of the globalist New World Order.
The UN was put up based upon Karl Marx Communist Manifesto,
but this time the whole world
would slowly be turned into the new Soviet Union.
The new world government would now be headquartered in New York
on 18 acres of prime real estate donated by the Rockefeller family.
This was the final nail in the coffin.
International communism had officially won the war.
The globalist NATO and EU also came as a consequence from the war
as stepping-stones to a future world government.
The United Nations, the Council of Foreign Relations,
the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group,
the Gorbachev foundation and the Club of Rome,
and many other shadowy Fifth Column organizations
now work together to destabilize the sovereign nations
to create a communist World Order.
Communism would spread from the Soviet Union with the help of communist Jews.
Even in China, Soviet Jews worked helping Mao Zedong.
High up in the political department of the Red Army in China
were W. N. Levitschev and J. B. Gamarnik.
By progressive social movements in the name of helping people,
communism killed over
60 million in the Soviet Union
70 million in the People's Republic of China
3 million in Korea
2 million in Cambodia
1.7 million in Africa
1.6 million in Vietnam
1.6 million in Poland
1.5 million in Afghanistan
1.2 million in Tito's Yugoslavia
1 million elsewhere in Eastern Europe
1 million in Ethiopia
400,000 in Romania
200,000 in Bulgaria
150,000 in Latin America
100,000 in Mongolia
100,000 in Albania
73,000 in Cuba
70,000 in the German Democratic Republic
65,000 in Czechoslovakia
27,000 in Hungary
10,000 by Communist Parties not in power
and the International communist movement;
yet, no movies, no Holocaust reparations,
no memorials for these victims.
The communist flag is not banned
and communist policies are still normalized
and Marxism is even taught as standard in our schools.
Western civilization that literally took thousands of years to develop
with the help of the Romans laying the foundation
was destroyed in less than two centuries.
All healthy societal norms have been broken down.
Healthy nationalism has been replaced with the cultural guilt,
ethno-masochism, self-hatred, apathy, degeneracy and pathological altruism.
Traditionalism is labeled sick and outdated.
Views on parenting have changed significantly.
Just 50 years ago, a person in Europe was first considered to be a grown-up
after they had created a strong family.
Thanks to the cultural Marxism brainwashing,
Europeans don't anymore believe their position in society
will be improved by having offspring.
Consequently, they instead focus on materialist matters
to fill up their void and unfulfillment.
As Europeans, we are no longer defined by our virtues, our intellects.
We do not longer exist as people with common history, heritage or values.
We have been reduced into ruthless, cultureless, genderless,
alienated, infertile, overmedicated and undereducated tax and debt slaves.
We are no longer people defined by our qualities or intellects.
We have become soulless machines, taxpayers and human resources.
We are defined solely by our net worth
and our ability to consume crap that we don't even need.
People no longer talk with each other on the streets.
We have forgotten everything that meant something to our ancestors.
We have lost touch with both our past and our present,
and we live in some imaginary fantasy world
where happiness is just around the corner,
but never really is found.
This is the world of blind equality
where all sexes, races, cultures, ethnicities are the same
in one homogeneous, rootless, ruthless, gray goop.
Each individual is the same.
Without roots, identities or cultures
we will be exploited by the tyrannical global elite.
Our identities are installed into us by the state instead of our parents.
Our people are stripped of a path to defend in our future.
The European spirit that was rooted in vital institutions
such as family, farm, folk and the community has been totally wiped out.
We are no longer defined by common cultures, traditions,
bloodlines and a set of everlasting values.
We are not united in our desire to protect our culture and a way of life.
This is our modern world.
This is the world of consumerism,
nihilism, hedonism and empty materialism.
The world of uninspiring, generic, modern abstract art and architecture.
The destruction of Western civilization
is applauded as something progressive and tolerant.
We now live in the world of cheap chinese imports for the rich
and eternal wage slavery for the poor.
This is a world of globalism
installed by the victors of the Second World War
by the ideology of international communism.
This was exactly what the National Socialists
during World War II tried to warn humanity of.
Our governments are acting on behalf of influential lobbyists,
NGOs and globalist organizations, which in turn work for a global elite.
The essential driving force and cohesive core of this global elite
consists of Jews who see the ethnic transformation
of former white homogenous Western countries
as beneficial for ethnically Jewish minority interests.
Because of historical, religious and mere tactical reasons
many Jews view the white race as their greatest enemy
and the fight for power and influence.
It is critical to realize that these powers
do not have our well-being in mind.
In their eyes, we are simply seen as their cattle.
In a multicultural society with other more visible
and on the surface more problematic minority groups,
Jews appear as a seemingly invisible minority
and not as an outside hostile social category.
In this way, the Jews can safely continue to exercise their power
by pushing their specific ethnic group interest
at the expense of the indigenous populations.
All the Jewish organizations got on board with the idea
that we have to import other peoples,
we have to change the demographic profile of these societies,
so that they will not be homogeneous anymore,
that they will not be able to gang up again against the Jews.
So, I think those are two big reasons.
One is to push aside the previous elite
to make room for Jewish elite, but also to the fear and real hatred
that the Jews have had historically towards white Christian societies.
The most powerful globalist currently is the Hungarian Jew George Soros.
He is known for his intense hatred for white people
and having his long tentacles in basically everything
that weakens Western civilization.
Everything that divides
and inflames minorities with hatred for white Europeans.
Soros nongovernmental organizations have engineered the migrant crisis,
knowing full well that there will inevitably be a major culture clash.
Soros funds the "divide and conquer" terror organization Black Lives Matter
that encourages violence against whites.
Soros funds the radical feminist organization Femen
who pits white women against their own men,
teach them to hate their fathers and despise their brothers
in relentless bashing of the hetero white male.
Femen and other feminist organizations, while marching around bare breasted,
advocate for radical Islam.
A religion that cuts up the clitorises of little girls
and requires the women to be covered up from head to toe.
Not only Germany and Europe lost the Second World War,
but even the nations in the Middle East,
as the Zionists and neo-cons invented the fictitious war on terror
after the 9/11 attacks to destabilize any nation that would try
to emulate the economic success of National Socialist Germany
and go against the globalists.
About ten days after 9/11 I went through the Pentagon
and I saw secretary Rumsfeld and deputy secretary Wolfowitz.
I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff
who you used to work for me and one of the generals called me and he said,
"Sir, you've gotta come in and talk to me a second".
I said, "Well, you're too busy". He said, "No, no", he says,
"We've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq."
This was on or about the 20th of September.
I said "We're going to war with Iraq? Why?"
He said "I don't know."
He said "I guess they don't know what else to do."
So I said "Well, did they find some information
connecting Saddam to Al-Qaeda?"
He said "No, no. It says there's nothing new that way.
They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq."
He said "I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists,
but we got a good military and we can take down governments."
And he said "I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer,
every problem has to look like a nail."
So, I came back to see him a few weeks later
and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan.
I said "Are we still going to war with Iraq?"
and he said "Oh, it's worse than that."
He said, he reached over on his desk, he picked up a piece of paper, he said
"I just...", he said "I just got this down from upstairs meeting,
the secretary of defense office today", and he said
"This is a memo that describes how we're gonna take out 7 countries in 5 years
starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia,
Sudan and finishing off Iran."
What is Israel's role in this, Ken O'Keefe?
Well, the Greater Israel project is all about destabilizing surrounding nations,
ultimately in pursuit of this dream of Greater Israel,
from the Euphrates down to the Nile,
all the way over to the eastern Mediterranean.
This is the dream of the psychopaths and so,
destabilizing governments, creating sectarian strife
is all part of that menu and all part of the design to create Greater Israel.
So, that goes... that's self-evident.
But I have to go back to what this gentleman is saying in Washington DC
about America not wanting to get involved, Obama not getting involved.
What are you talking about?
We have been arming people directly who are Al-Qaeda.
Our neutral front is Al-Qaeda.
These people are psychopaths to the worst order.
They're conducting suicide attacks, they're gassing people.
We know Carla Del Ponte said in May that it was the so-called rebels in Syria
that were using sarin gas, not the Bashar al-Assad regime.
No, it was not. We know that the United States president
is arming people who are on the U.S. terrorist list.
He should be convicted of aiding and abetting,
giving material support to a terrorist organization,
but then, again, you know what? We are.
We, the West, the United States in particular, Israel and Britain
are the biggest terrorists on the planet.
So, our little junior partners in Al-Qaeda,
which is nothing more than CIA database, thus the name al Qaeda,
this is nothing more than a group of terrorists working together,
each play, one different role,
but all of them working together for the same goal,
which is to maintain this hideous and
sick and twisted injust world that we have,
which is a perpetual state of war.
Always one illusion, one boogeyman after another,
but the fact is Obama is nothing more than a puppet war criminal
just like his predecessor and every other US president before him.
So, please don't tell our people out there that the U.S. is not involved.
It's directly involved and it is arming people who are absolute psychopaths.
That is what we discussed earlier, the Greater Israel project
to destabilize any Arab regime
which might have any kind of autonomy and self-determination.
Any regime in the Arab world that is not an absolute puppet cannot be tolerated.
And who are the nations that we target?
Those that are not puppets. We don't target those like the Saudi regime,
which is the biggest human rights violator in that region.
It's cutting off people's heads in public, cutting off hands.
It is the most grotesque regime on the planet,
and yet we get that regime weapons. It's no problem, whatsoever.
The duplicity and hypocrisy of the United States and the West
can't even be measured, it is so enormous
and these mouthpieces, such as this gentleman in Washington,
is only doing a disservice to himself and his country.
And the fact is that American sons and daughters
will get involved in this yet again. And these chickenhawks,
who are pretending to care about the Syrian people,
are gonna be sacrificing not their own sons and daughters.
I would like this man to send his sons and daughters
and his grandchildren off to Syria, when this turns into a greater conflict,
because this is what we're flirting with is a world war.
A third world war. This is not a joke.
We are flirting with a third world war on the basis that apparently
we care so much about the Syrian people,
just like we care so much about the Iraqi people and the Afghani people.
The only people that buy this sort of stuff are either
bought off prostitutes or the dumbest of the dumb.
And we're also led to believe that Assad
is the dumbest idiot dictator on the planet. Now, isn't he?
Because he invited UN inspectors to come in
and he brought them in, on the very day that they come in,
he decides to attack his own people
ten miles away from where the inspectors arrived.
This is beyond ridiculous and the only people that buy this, again,
are bought off prostitutes or the dumbest of the dumb.
The greater Israel plan was actually preplanned
by Theodor Herzl long before, when he said
"The area of the Jewish State
stretches from the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates."
But they did not learn what went on in World War II.
The perpetrators, the victorious Allies and their Jewish handlers,
they hid the crimes from the world with a blitz of books,
TV programs, documentaries and movies as you point out,
and to this day – look around just, look around ourselves,
we have wars in the Middle East non-stop.
And for the sake (?) of Israel and Israel alone.
Now, Israel has a proxy called United States.
Let's just call him uncle stupid or uncle sucker.
Every time Israel wants an enemy taken out,
whether it's Afghanistan, whether it's Iraq, or hopefully,
I mean hopefully not Iran, they want us to attack Iran.
Well, they just point their pitbull, uncle stupid, in that direction
and uncle stupid dutifully goes to war with that nation and destroys it.
That has got to stop. We didn't learn from World War II
and we're still committing the same mistakes.
Being a dreadful, awful, ghastly racist such as myself,
does tend to give me an advantage,
because it means I can actually talk about race.
And we do need to talk about race,
because the 21st century, unless things change,
will see the virtual extinction of my white European race.
THE GREAT REPLACEMENT
Back in Europe and by extension America, Canada and Australia,
the indigenous people, cultures and nations have now lost their right
to exist in their own homelands and are now facing extinction.
In fact, today it is basically a crime for an area to be too white.
No school, no town, no nation is allowed to be white anymore.
Yet, there are no one pushing for Israel, the Middle East,
Africa or Asia to become multicultural, right?
The indigenous people of Europe are treated like
second-class citizens in their own countries.
The governments are actively working
to lift up so called minorities and push whites down.
As an example of the utter hypocrisy,
Israel, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar,
Kuwait and Bahrain have refused to take in refugees.
So, have you seen any media footage about this?
Have you seen anyone calling them racist?
While white European women of childbearing age today
are a small minority of 2% of the entire world's population,
they are encouraged to breed outside of their own race
to throw away thousands of years of ethnic heritage and culture.
The result will be that those pure genetics
that have been refined in Europe for thousands of years will be gone forever.
So, what is diversity? Is it this?
Or is it this?
According to the establishment, this is not diverse,
but this very diverse.
Not diverse.
Very diverse.
No diversity here.
So diverse.
We get it.
The meaning of diversity as used by the establishment
is everyone but white people.
Well, unless they are sexual deviants.
So, it's everyone but straight white people.
Diversity is being rewritten to mean
the inclusion of individuals representing more than one national origin,
color, religion, socioeconomic group, sexual orientation.
Did you get that?
This definition says it's non-whites, muslims, Jews and anyone not Christian,
poor people meaning the third world, and sexual deviance.
According to them,
if you don't include these groups, you will never qualify as diverse.
So, if you're a straight white person
living in a homogeneous, nationalist, Christian white country
you won't ever get a gold star for diversity.
This new definition of diversity was inspired by Marxist critical theory,
which arose from the Frankfurt School in the '30's.
They were hostile communists who fled to America
and pushed words like racism, xenophobia, anti-Semite to sow division.
They pointed their fingers at others
while they agreed with violent communist revolutions
that killed more than any other ideology on the planet.
You know what diversity doesn't include for a Marxist?
Diversity of political opinions.
Diversity can only mean thinking like a leftist.
They're not welcoming a wide range of political viewpoints.
They're not saying
"it doesn't matter if you're a rightist because we accept you."
No, they shout "Nazi, racist" and demand censorship.
They want to ruin your life and destroy you
because of your deferring political views.
They don't want diversity of thought.
They want leftist rule where dissenting opinions are shut down by force.
Diversity is used as a weapon against nationalists.
And leftists use minority groups to further their agenda,
to be the wedge that breaks apart the cohesion of the majority.
We were told we must overcome our racist nature and embrace open borders
for a more utopian world where we accept everyone holding hands as one.
We're told it's our duty as white people,
that we alone hold the key to usher in world peace.
It's up to us to make our countries a home for everyone
where all races, religions and ideologies live together in our country,
because only white people are racist.
Well, if you want to talk about peace,
the most peaceful countries in the world happen to be white.
When someone says
"You white people aren't diverse and can only become diverse
by importing the third world into your countries",
this is psychological warfare.
An action intended to undermine our morale and unity as a people.
An enemy can use pretty words while having dirty motives.
Remember, communists talked about the greater good
while they mass murdered millions of Russians
who disagreed and stood in the way of their utopia.
Migrant invaders in Europe learned very fast
to shout racism and diversity, because it gets them stuff.
They don't care about sharing and equality.
They want to be the King on the top.
MONEY MONEY MONEY
Europeans are the most compassionate and giving of any people.
Third world nations receive billions and aid from us,
and when they need medicine or education, who do they call?
Us.
But our goodwill is also easy to take advantage of. We get hustled.
It's sad that a white man can go to the moon,
but just don't call him racist or he will have a breakdown.
That's how deep anti-white propaganda and lies
has rotted our morale and confidence as a people.
We don't even take our own side,
because it's practically the Holocaust, if we do.
In the beginning, leftists who pushed the dream of diversity
were naive idealists, but not anymore.
Despite terrorist attacks, increasing violence, rape,
and constant conflict in our multicultural societies,
we continue to be propagandized at every level that
diversity is our strength.
We're expected to deny reality.
The truth is in our face
and the whites who live in diverse areas have to take the brunt of it.
Rich white liberals who are activists for diversity
live in their ivory towers surrounded by other rich white people,
chauffeured from white place to white place untouched by all diversity.
Harvard political scientist and leftist Robert Putnam
set out to do a study on how awesome diversity is.
What did he really learn?
When you shove a bunch of different people together – diversity,
it creates less social cohesion, distrust,
conflict and it hurts overall civic life.
People stop trusting each other and they stop being nice and happy.
Daily life becomes a battle.
When you mix thousands of people together
from different cultures and languages, religions,
social classes and political views, they won't get along.
What a shocking revelation.
Diversity isn't like the TV shows where one of each race and creed goes shopping
and lunches together, talking about how awesome liberalism is.
Before the word diversity,
white Americans were once whole as a united group
in a country that was nearly entirely white.
Even blacks did better during segregation versus today.
It is diversity that has divided white people. We are now divergent.
If there's a white neighborhood, company, government or movie
we hear how it needs diversity.
In other words, it needs non-whites.
It is all about race.
All about replacing white people wherever they are.
We can't have anything that is all our own
without hearing non-whites complain about it.
They want us to facilitate them in everything we create
and they shout "slavery, colonialism, Jim Crow, white supremacy"
to get a leg up, because they couldn't do it on their own.
White people, give your fucking money,
your fucking house, your fucking property.
We need it. Fucking all. We need these reparations...
It's a strategy to win. They didn't even come up with it on their own.
Non-white minority groups
have learned they can get ahead simply by crying diversity,
even when they're not qualified for the position.
It's a shakedown.
Out-groups have learned they can align together,
cry minority and chisel their way into our spaces,
weakening our cohesion as a group. It's a power grab.
All the while, they pretend to care about the goodwill of all mankind
through pretty words like equality and tolerance, diversity,
but their actions say the opposite.
They want their group to hold power and influence.
They also want revenge and think white people owe them, but we don't.
They don't care about the truth.
They want to get ahead and they want to win as a group.
It's not white people going to black or Asian areas demanding
they include white people in every facet of their existence.
They have things that are exclusively theirs
and they also have countries where they are the majority.
They have no obligation to include anyone else and neither do we.
We, whites, should be a majority in our country.
We made every aspect of it.
There's nothing wrong with us being dominant in our own country.
But even though we are still a majority,
we're told it's supremacy when we occupy the majority of society.
(?) It's why society's become increasingly diverse,
there's no end in sight.
And in cities where non-whites are the majority,
they're calling for an anti-white privilege,
even though the job market openly discriminates against whites.
And we hear how campuses must end racism
even when they are fully dictated by diversity politics.
When will diversity finally be achieved?
At what point will commies and non-whites be satisfied?
I'll tell you.
When Europeans no longer have an identity,
culture or country of their own. When white people no longer exist.
It's a kind of utopia,
just the fact that the whole world will mix up with each other,
that in, I don't know, 70, 80 years,
there will be no white people anymore and only cappuccino-colured people.
That's the only way. This is the only solution.
- Yeah, mixed up. - It's our only hope...
- to (bleep) our way out of this. - Yes!
It's gonna take some time, but it's really the only way.
The sort of Singaporean model where everybody is so mixed up
that you really don't know who to hate,
because everybody is so hopelessly intertwined.
But we're a long way from that.
They're advocating the biggest genocide in all of history.
I mean, once white is gone, it's gone.
- You ain't gonna get it back, right? - Yeah.
It's just interesting, because this is only targeting whites.
They're not talking about "no more brown people"
or "no more black people".
Just "no more white people", because then that will solve the problem.
If we're all just darker-skinned, then we won't hate each other.
This is the solution to the problem.
- Cappuccino-coloured, you know... Germans. - That's right.
They started talking about Cologne and all the rapes,
and then it goes into the final solution.
The only solution is for those women to have brown babies.
Are you fucking kidding me?
I think that we should go down there and tell them that
Jews and Palestinians should blend for peace, right?
Yeah, of course.
You need to just end this by mixing yourself out and have mixed babies,
- and then maybe the conflict will end. - Exactly.
Well, there's another coincidence there and you brought this out.
The changing face of America. Do you remember that? Pushing all this?
Oh, yeah, yeah. Of course.
Lise Funderburg, who turns out is Jewish, you know?
Remember these pictures of these very unrealistic babies?
Oh, yeah. Yeah. The dream of the mocha-coloured, the future of all of us.
Israel has a huge wall around its country.
There will be no white people anymore...
Let's take a look at Israel in the meantime, right?
Okay, fine, I get that. It's not a problem.
You don't want these people in your countries, I get that.
But then don't come and judge us for not wanting it
and push it into our countries. That's the problem I have with here.
Israel recognizes less than one percent of asylum seekers.
I mean, talk about the utter hypocrisy.
They even have DNA, you know, issues in terms of immigration, right?
That you have to have, for you to get in to Israel,
- you have to be Jewish by DNA. - That is correct.
And it's actually worse. It's worse than that, because what they're doing now
is that they're actually shipping people out of Israel,
to send them to places like Sweden, right?
So, they actually pay, specifically African migrants,
because Jews, many Jews in Israel, they actually hate blacks.
They have a huge problem with racism in Israel.
But they're going to the shores of Europe
to welcome Syrian migrants, African migrants, Afghani migrants,
Iraqi migrants, pointing the way, standing out, in like, waving, you know,
"Here, here it is... coming! This way!", right?
- Yeah. Literally, literally doing that. - Unbelievable.
Again, you have Jewish women showing up in Europe,
in a country that is not theirs, that are welcoming invaders.
Let's go to Israel. I saw this on Twitter.
Let's get a good group together, go to Israel, start up some aid, you know,
and then welcome, just welcome, all the non-jews, the Arabs, the Africans.
Why can't we do that? What would happen then?
How about we go there and set up aid for the Palestinians
and why aren't these women doing that, if they claimed that,
"Oh, we're in such a good relationship with Muslims"?
If we would have gone to Israel and done something like this,
there would be military descending on us in ten minutes.
We probably would not even make it there, to be honest,
of invading their space, right?
Again, without people realizing, it's actually a huge strategy behind this
to bring in more migrants into Europe to destroy them ethnically, right?
They're against everything white and pro-minority.
Up and down, they're pro-gun control. Always pro-gun control.
Always pro-minority. Always pro-illegal immigration.
They're always pro Middle Eastern war (?) and American body bags.
They're always anti-white. Jews are always foremost
in promoting race mixing among whites and browns and blacks.
You can see it in American TV, as far back as 20 and 30... 40 years even.
And on top of this actual phenomenon that we can all witness,
we have the propaganda.
Every ad I see now has some kind of mixed couple of some sort.
I see this being pushed everywhere.
White men are made to look nerdy and stupid.
They can't dance and they're so boring,
but the non-white men are made to look strong, masculine and heroic.
It is no longer a good thing to have white children.
They are considered boring and nondiverse.
Not only do you have propaganda which is massively anti-white,
we have weaponized words.
Anyone that talks about any of these topics
is always called one particular word. Can you guess what that word is?
- The "R" word. - Racist.
Anytime you have propaganda and weaponized words especially,
words that are supposed to set off triggers
to shut you down, to keep you shut up.
And we have phenomenon we're no longer in the realm of propaganda.
If you have propaganda backed up by phenomenon, we're now into warfare.
- Psychological warfare. - Yeah.
And psychological warfare is always reduced down to,
you know, you're either with us or against us.
You have to have something to say when people are calling you a name,
especially in a mean, malicious way,
and the word racist is used as a weapon all over Western civilization.
It's used to stigmatize. It's used basically to silencing the opposition.
And what you want to do is not be silenced.
So, when someone calls you a racist, you just say
"You're just saying that because I'm white.
Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white."
Racism only applies to white people's homes,
white people's churches, white countries.
It doesn't apply to anyone else. They're not trying to yell racism anywhere else.
Racism is an anti-white hate slur. It's really what it is.
And the phenomenon in Western civilization
is massive amounts of immigration. You can't debate it.
You can't even talk about it or you're a Nazi...
we've all heard the word before.
So, we have forced immigration, forced integration, forced assimilation
and then they tell us about our inevitable brown future.
They're doing this in white countries and only in white countries.
You know, China is still going to be Chinese 50 years from now,
Africa is still going to be Africa,
Saudi Arabia is still gonna be full of Arabs,
but we're all supposed to be blended.
United Nations data show that the African population
is rising from 200 million in 1950 to a projected 4.2 billion in 2100.
This is an increase of 2,000 %.
These projections foresee 40% of the world's population
and about half of its children being African by the end of this century.
The world has right now more than 60 million people
that would want to get to the West.
Relocating these people geographically to every white country
will not help anybody,
and our nations, people and cultures will never survive it.
Some people say that mass immigration into the United States
can help reduce world poverty.
Is that true? Well, no, it's not. And let me show you why.
This gum-ball represents the 1 million legal immigrants
that the United States has taken every year on average since 1990.
Now, who in the world deserves our humanitarian compassion?
The World Bank has one measure of the desperately poor of the world,
they make less than two dollars a day.
And how many people make less than two dollars a day in the world?
We'll start with Africa.
In Africa alone, there are 650 million people
who make less than 2 dollars a day. 650 million.
And in India? Another 890 million people, desperately poor.
China? Add another 480 million people making less than two dollars a day.
And unfortunately, the rest of Asia has a heartbreaking 810 million people
who the World Bank says make less than 2 dollars a day.
And finally, there is 105 million of Latin America's population
that are desperately poor.
All total, the World Bank says that there are 3 billion people in the world,
3 billion people, who are desperately poor,
making less than two dollars a day. That's 3 thousand gum-balls.
And every year,
we take a million
and suggest
that we have somehow made a humanitarian difference?
Of course, we don't pull our immigrants
from these desperately poor population, do we?
These people are too poor, too sick, too disconnected,
to make it here as immigrants.
We tend to pull our immigrants out of the better off poor of the world.
How many people in the world live in countries
that have average incomes lower than that of Mexico?
And the World Bank tells us that that number is
these 3 billion plus another 2.6 billion people.
5.6 billion people in the world...
who live in countries with average incomes below that of Mexico.
That's 5600 gum-balls.
So, what is it that the elites are telling us?
They're telling us that when we take this 1 million immigrants
that we somehow or another are tackling world poverty.
And we have to do it regardless of the effect on our unemployed,
the working poor, the most vulnerable members of our society.
Regardless of the effect on our natural resources.
Even if we went by the most radical proposals of Washington,
which are to actually double our immigration to 2 million a year,
which would totally overwhelm our physical, natural
and social infrastructures, we couldn't make a noticeable difference.
And we may be really hurting the impoverished people in the world,
because the million that we do take are amongst the most energetic,
often the better educated, certainly the most dissatisfied people
that, if the did not immigrate, would be the agents for change
to improve the lot of all the people in these countries.
The true heroes in the global humanitarian field
are the people in these countries who have the wherewithal
to emigrate to another country, but instead stay in their countries
to apply their skills to help their fellow countrymen.
Unfortunately, our immigration system tends to entice
these very type of people to abandon their countrymen.
The impossibility of making even a dent
is actually worse than its looks here, because...
last year, when we took 1 million immigrants,
these countries added, births over deaths,
80 million more people into the impoverished populations.
And this year, Congress is bringing in a million legal immigrants.
And this year, according to the United Nations,
these countries are expected to add another 80 million people.
And next year, you can be quite sure that Congress,
unless stopped by the American voters,
will bring in another million immigrants.
And these countries unfortunately will be adding...
another 80 million people into these impoverished nations.
We can take 5 million a year,
but we'd never get ahead of what's happening in these countries.
Not in this century.
Don't you see?
Immigration can never be an effective or significant way
to deal with the suffering people in the world.
They have to be helped where they live.
99.9% of them will never be able to immigrate to a rich country.
There is no hope for that. They have to bloom where they're planted.
The only place that 99.9% of these people can be helped is where they live.
Let's help them there.
What is happening today is the replacement of the white race
which the UN even admits to and calls replacement migration.
This is, in fact, according to the UN's definition, a genocide.
White genocide.
Massive non-white immigration
to all European white countries is textbook genocide.
Genocide is simply the intentional attempt to get rid of an ethnic group
or destroy its foundations of life, which is exactly what is happening
to white Europeans in the world as millions of hostile third-world migrants
are flooding their countries, changing their demographics rapidly.
At the very same time, our establishment is promoting abortion,
divorce, feminism, hookup culture, miscegenation and homosexuality
to lower the birth rates of the white Europeans.
After the fall of the Third Reich, genocidal Kaufmann, Coudenhove-Kalergi
and the Hooton plans for Germany became the reality for all of Western Europe
through the creation of the European Union and the UN.
Not only Germany, but the entire white Western world
has since then undergone attacks of unprecedented scales demographically
that will lead to the indigenous European population very soon
becoming minorities in the homelands of their own ancestors.
...compiled for the program suggest that in the next 20 years
the ethnic diversity of the city will change dramatically.
The first time ever the number of people who class themselves
as white British is now a minority in London.
People who identify as white British citizens
are now a minority in the capital city.
White folks are on track to becoming, and I hate to say this,
the minority in America.
A new report out by the government shows that by the year 2042
white Americans will no longer represent the majority of the population.
That prediction is 8 years sooner than previously expected.
That the native French population would be finding itself
in a rapidly decreasing minority.
Ethnic Norwegian in the minority in 20 years
In 2030's
Children from white families in Birmingham are set to become
a minority group for the first time and this year census is collected in March.
The latest census suggest white British people are now in a minority.
Census Bureau says white will be a minority.
Californians know a thing or two about demographic change.
70% of all state school pupils in Los Angeles are Hispanic.
For the first time in American history,
non-whites make up half or more of the next generation,
according to a new study by the Pew Research Center.
Latest census suggest that white Brits are now a minority in London.
And the fact that we are going to become a minority
in our own country before 2050, well before 2050 for the younger people.
When the parent culture kind of dissipates,
you're left thinking "what's going on?"
Through the immigration law of 1965, a group of Jews, including: Jacob Javits,
Emanuel Celler, Leo Pfeffer (Former president of American Jewish Congress, AJC),
Norman Podhoretz (writer and member of the Council of Foreign Relations)
decided that America would open its borders and become a "Melting Pot".
Ten years later, the Zionist Jews David Schwartz and Inga Gottfarb
would do the same with Sweden.
With a population of 10 million people, Sweden is today home to just 20,000 Jews.
Being just 0,2% of the population, they own the majority
of Sweden's anti-Swedish media through the Bonnier family
and a disproportionate number of journalists and experts have names like
Wolodarski, Silberstein, Radetzki, Rothstein, Aschberg, Leman, Epstein, etc.
Another example is Jersey Sarnecki, a Jewish criminologist
who is trotted out on a regular basis to "debunk" that crime
is increasing or that migrants commit more crime than natives.
The end of days you're going to need the iron (?) of yourself,
which represents a dome which is the West,
Europe and the Americas to get intermixed with Ishmael,
which is basically Arabs and Muslims.
How in the world was this ever going to happen if not for this refugee crisis?
At the end of days, you're going to have this intermixing between a South,
a dome, which is the West, and the East, which is the Muslims and the Arabs.
Making this through this influx into the world.
And they're going to have children, you know,
I don't wanna say by the dozens,
but they're going to have a far larger birth rate
than the indigenous people there
and they're going to, sort of, conquer by number.
There many different sources for this.
One of them in ???, chapter 14 and many other sources
as far as this is concerned, where it's mentioned very, very vividly,
what will happen to the Jews and what will happen to ???,
what will happen to the world at that time,
where there will be many many people killed and so on and so forth.
So, the idea of having these refugees come into Europe
it's no longer a matter of whether it's right or wrong,
it's just simply a fulfillment of what it was meant all along,
it's the fulfillment of ??? and the prophecies.
This has to happen ant it's just another sign that we are nearing,
you know, the completion of ??? of the entire world.
(EU should 'undermine national homogeneity' says UN migration chief)
(Islamization of Europe a good thing)
"There shall be no remnants and survivors from the impurity of Christianity."
Rabbi Baruch Efrati Jewish school head in West Bank
I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism, because BARBARA LERNER SPECTRE
at this point in time, Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. Founding Director, Paideia Stockholm
And I think we are going to be part of the throes
of that transformation, which must take place.
Europe is not going to be the monolithic
societies they once were in the last century.
Jews are going to be at the centre of that.
It's a huge transformation for Europe to make.
They are now going into a multicultural mode
and Jews will be resented, because of our leading role.
But without that leading role and without that transformation,
Europe will not survive.
There are two issues at the top of our agenda at the very moment.
One is the unbelievably important immigration debate in this country.
To make sure that immigrants from around the world,
particularly those from south of our border, have a chance here.
The 12 million, then the 13 million that live here
and do work and aren't really going home.
That they have a chance to stay here justly and as legal immigrants.
Now, coming back to your question of the clash between
the secular post-Christian Europe and the new immigration wave,
which is essentially religious – yes, this is what exactly what is happening.
There is a clash of civilizations and we, the Jews,
we are in the middle of this clash of civilization.
I've always believed that Britain is a country of migrants. I'm Jewish...
The Jews want us dead, because we have been their greatest challenge
ever since they started their program of basically dividing and conquering.
Ladies and gentlemen, I hereby prompt you to participate at the protest
"Live better without Nazis – diversity is our future",
on the 6th of June at 10a.m. in Neurupinn.
We have to take a stand against the Nazis.
Because of our history between 1933 - 1945,
we are obliged to treat refugees properly.
We also have to save their lives in the Mediterranean.
There has to be a legal [unbureaucratic] way to get asylum in Europe.
Countries like Poland, very Catholic by the way,
have to be willing to accept [more] refugees.
Oh, and by the way:
Every year, more native Germans die than there are born.
That is very fortunate.
It's because the Nazis are not very good at having offspring.
This decline [of Germans] is why we are so dependent
on immigration from foreign countries.
AJC has always worked on the premise that, as a minority,
our security, our strength, our well-being in America
is interdependent with those of other minorities.
This is a Jewish issue.
The thing that makes Judaism dangerous to everybody,
to every race, to every nation, to every idea
is that we smash things that aren't true.
We don't believe in the boundaries of nation-state,
we don't believe in the ideas of these individual gods
that, you know, that protect individual groups of people.
These are all artificial constructions
and Judaism really teaches us how to see that.
In a sense, our detractors have us right,
in that we are a corrosive force, we're breaking down
the false gods of all nations and all people, because they're not real.
Immigration is the future. You cannot work and live
in a globalized world, in the middle of the world, in Europe,
without immigration and moving populations,
so, you have to really make a good policy of immigration all over Europe
and we see that the history of Europe with this long history of nationalism
and small countries is now getting into a crisis,
so, this will need a long time to make it better,
but you have to in front (?) this,
you have to really change the policy of immigration inside Europe.
This is very important. You have to adapt the educational system
and adapt all the self understanding of the states.
They are not anymore only white or only Swedish
or only Portuguese or only German.
They are multicultural places in the world.
The Messiah will return only once Edom (Europe, Christianity)
will be totally destroyed.
So I ask you: is it good news that Islam invades Europe?
It's excellent news! It means the coming of the Messiah.
Excellent news.
The liberal democrats will always stand up
for Britain that is open, tolerant and diverse.
And in that spirit, I very much welcome the Jewish European election manifesto
calling for a strengthening of EU hate crime legislation.
As a party, we wholeheartedly value the relationship we have
with the Jewish community, both in Britain and internationally.
You see ourselves together, fighting together with our Muslim brothers
and they are our natural allies.
We'll bring in a million Africans, half a million Filipinos,
2 or 3 million Chinese and that's the end of it for Israel!
Why is it threatening if there were to be another million Africans here?
It's threatening because this will no longer be a Jewish state.
Our country is different from other countries.
Our country is a Jewish state. A Jewish and democratic state.
So, how many people in Europe would be eligible
under the law of return to move here?
3 million, 4 million maybe, altogether. It could change the geopolitics.
What you mean that could change the geopolitics?
Who knows? For demography is a key of everything, as you know.
Between the Jordan and the Mediterranean,
these are borders [for] 10 million people,
about half [of them] Jews and a half [of them] Arabs.
And if we want to remain a democratic state,
we have to have a majority of Jews in this place.
Europe is not always going to be there, I'm afraid.
2025 in Europe will be very different to 2015
and 2035 will be different to 2025 ad infinitum.
And this is purely down to demographics.
You know, the English have taken on board the preaching
of the feminists groups and we no longer have enough children.
And we're now down to 1.5 child per couple,
which means tomorrow's generation is 25% smaller than today's generation,
but the Islamic immigrants coming in are averaging 4 children per couple.
And that's not just per couple, because they also have 4 wives.
Not all of them, but some of them.
So, some of them are having 16 children per one man.
And furthermore, when the average English woman,
if she can be bothered to have a child at all,
is in her mid 30's or early 40's,
these Muslim women are having children aged 16 to 21.
We are really going to start to notice the rise not just in demographics,
but as they grow they they start demanding more
and they start pushing more, and because they back this up with terrorism,
with Jihad, the government listens to them.
You know. They push, we submit.
And that's what's happening in Britain
and, of course, with laws (?) in Denmark and all across Europe.
Sweden is literally a lost country.
Now, we in Britain have maybe two decades
before everything really hits the wall.
In Sweden, we're looking at 5 years to 10 years
and Sweden has terrible, enormous problems.
Malmo is now the rape capital of the European continent.
Aside from South Africa,
I think it's the rape capital of the world. It is that bad.
By the time the politicians have finally got the balls
to stand up and tell the truth, it may be too late at that time
from demographic reasons to actually do anything about it.
I came here really today to make the point that
do not let what has happened in Europe and in Britain happen to America.
You all need to look at what's happening in Britain and Sweden and Europe,
and you all need to make sure that you retain your First Amendment rights,
because, unless we can talk about this,
unless we can bring it out in the open,
you in America will go the same way.
You need to stand up and look at what we're doing and say
"This is never going to happen here."
Thank you.
A lot of the Jews that I talked to seem to be very pro-immigration,
but not to Israel.
Do you think that Israel should be taking a lot of Syrian refugees in?
...it's probably not in their self-interest...
It's not what I asked.
Man, that's hard.
Oh, really?
Probably...
- Yes or no? - Probably not.
Why?
Well, because they sort of want to kill the people that they'd emigrate to.
My concern is doing away with whiteness...
whiteness is a form of racial oppression, sure.
The suggestion is that is somehow possible
to separate whiteness from oppression and it is not.
There can be no white race without the phenomenon of white supremacy.
If you abolish slavery, you abolish slaveholders.
In the same way, if you abolish racial oppression,
you do away with whiteness.
Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.
Your views are fairly well received in academia.
Yes, they legitimate. Not to say that everyone agrees, but sure.
I could not point to any examples
where it has provoked political censorship.
To me, white is just an identity that arises entirely out of oppression. "The white race is the cancer of humanity." - Jewish activist Susan Sontag
Whiteness is not a culture, it's not a religion, it's not a language.
It's simply an oppressive social category.
Blacks' blackness is an identity that can be plausibly argued
to arise out of a resistance to oppression.
Black Studies is a study of a people that has formed itself
in resistance to its oppression.
And the task is to bring this minority together in such a way
that it makes it impossible
for the legacy of whiteness to continue to reproduce itself.
Europe must be multicultural.
Jews are going to be at the centre of that.
#Endwhitepeople
Germany is facing a drastic number of refugees by the end of 2015.
Believed to be in the region of 1.5 million.
It is not quite on a biblical scale, but an exodus - it certainly is.
Migrants who've been trapped in the railway station in Budapest
now deciding to walk the hundreds of miles to Germany
and what they see is the promise land.
The other side of this tragedy is how it will change Europe.
Non-western migrants had already been flooding into Europe for decades.
Leaders refuse to stop it.
We're afraid.
We're in danger every day, every minute.
They're coming inside... the police...
They want to kill each other.
You have to do something!
Someone has to protect us!
They are in our houses!
We are the victims here, not them.
We have to live like we used to before.
We have to live our lives, they took it from us!
We're not in war, they are!
They have to take them from here.
It's the city...
It's not a place for people... like them!
They wish they were dead!
They have lost their fertility!
So they look for fertility in our midst!
We shall give them fertility! We will breed children with them!
Take the "refugees"!
We shall soon collect them in the name of the coming Caliphate!
I'm telling you honestly, Islam will come to Germany,
whether you like it or not.
Your daughter will wear a headscarf (Hijab)! Your son wil wear beard.
Okay? And your daughter will marry a bearded man.
We are reproducing faster and faster.
You Germans are not getting any children.
In best case, you get 2 children.
We make 7-8 children! (arabic)
Okay, my colleague? And then we take 4 wives each, then we have 22 children.
Maybe you Germans have 1 child and a dog. And that's it.
This is not our fault, it's your fault, mate.
If you exploited our countries, colonized our countries,
So you can drive Mercedes and use your digital camera there?!
So make it Allah (blessed be his name), the almighty god, that we conquer you,
Not with war, here in Germany, but with birth rates, firstly!
And secondly, we will marry your daughters.
And your daughter will wear a Muslim headscarf. That's how it is.
Now you can get really mad. I can see the hate in your eyes.
Where do we go? Germany!
Germany! Germany!
Godfather of the European Union, Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi,
published the plan for a united Europe
and the ethnocide of the peoples of Europe,
the encouragement of mass non-white immigration was central to the plot.
Since then, an unholy alliance of leftists, capitalists
and Zionist supremacists has schemed to promote immigration and miscegenation
with the deliberate aim of breeding us out of existence in our own homelands.
As indigenous resistance to this human genetic-modification industry grows,
the criminal elite seeks new ways to camouflage their project.
First, their immigrant pawns were temporary guest workers;
then it was a multiracial experiment;
then they were refugees, and then the answer to a shrinking population.
Different excuses, different lies – and asylum is just another one.
But the real aim stays the same: the biggest genocide in human history,
the final solution of the Christian European problem.
This crime demands a new set of Nuremberg trials,
and you people will be in the dock.
Mr. president, I'm really ashamed
of the racist and xenophobic terms that were used by Mr. Griffin,
and my only question to him is
if he dare to make any concrete suggestions
and amendments to those legislations.
Is your policy serious or are you just shouting?
And I hope you will not be reelected, if you seek reelection,
because it's a shame for this parliament
the kind of statements you have just made.
It's you... the shouting, because obviously the truth hurts.
Yes, I will be seeking reelection.
Yes, I will return here to speak up about for indigenous Europeans
which the founder of this place has deliberately set out to wipe out,
because that is a crime, I'm telling the truth.
I have a constructive suggestion to help those poor asylum seekers from Africa.
Yes, make it clear they can't come here,
so they don't try to cross the sea and drown in huge numbers.
The best way for them to is to get the banks off the backs of their countries,
so they can live in peace in their countries
and we, Europeans, can live in peace in ours.
I just want to tell what me and my dog
experienced when we were out walking today.
We were out walking,
as we always do,
and then we were going down to the lake, because it's such a sunny day
and we are going out to play and "kejser" [dog] should be allowed
to have fun and play in the water, by the lake,
then 4 guys walks toward us and first asks questions
about my dog and then they start to kick my dog,
which makes me very very angry, and we start arguing
and then they start to throw stones against us [me and the dog].
I can't remember what else happened at that time, but suddenly there are
multiple persons at the scene, and pulls in me as you can see.
I don't know if you can see it,
but then they started to throw me onto the ground and kicking me on the ground
and roll me around and then they throwed me into the lake.
Now I'm standing here, wet from top to toe
with a dog that needs to go to a vet,
because it's scared and was hit with a rock
and I'm angry about all this happened just because
I have a dog that people don't like.
If you don't like my dog, then stay away from us!
I thought I was the only one who's in a bad mood because of this.
No, none of us want this. We're all scared.
What is this? How will this be in 100 years?
This is not my life. It just shows you how many of them are here already.
Now there's another 1.5 million who came this year.
Every year 2-3 million arrive.
- It's generally about foreign infiltration. - Yes, exactly.
We won't dress like we do now.
Here, no! They won't take anything from me!
Look, when I walk through the streets of the city, it's only foreigners [blacks]!
There are walking 50 foreigners and I only see 1 European face.
Look at the women! They're all veiled (wearing Burka/Hijab)
This is our future.
Merkel says we'll make it!
Yes, we'll make it! We'll make it to our collective doom!
No, we won't make it.
Low birthrate amongst host population +
mass imigration & state enforced multiculturalism +
high birthrates amongst immigrants =
demographic genocide
(The new Europeans)
"I don't think there will be white people in 200 years and that's a good thing."
Dr. Wilfred Reilly, Professor of Political Sciences Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences
Increasing groups of people are essentially asking a question.
If the political establishment continues to get its way
in 5, in 10, in 20 years time, how many Germans are gonna be left in Germany?
How many French people are gonna be left in France?
How many English people are gonna be left in England?
French writer Renaud Camus calls the influx "the great replacement",
and says it's the biggest thing to happen to France since the 15th century.
What's the goal?
The goal is to meet the [EU] challenge of interracial marriage.
It's not a choice.
It's an obligation.
If voluntarism does not work for the republic,
then the state will move in with more coercive measures.
We must change,
therefore, we will change!
Hardly anyone imagined just 20 years ago that the native French population
would be finding itself in a rapidly decreasing minority here.
London has got so ethnically diverse
that white Britons are now a minority here.
White families in Birmingham
are set to become a minority group for the first time.
The country's most rapidly growing demographic is Muslim.
With Mohammed now the most popular name for baby boys in London.
The high Muslim birth rate is changing the political landscape.
Imran is looking forward to replacing Belgian law with Sharia law,
including amputation for theft, stoning for adultery and death to homosexuals.
If they want to push us back or something like that,
I don't know, maybe they can start to marry 4 wives
and have a lot of children.
Start with that. Maybe they will have a chance, but I don't think so.
Something else that Muslim immigration appears to have brought to Norway
is what some here call a rape epidemic.
Recent police statistics showed that in the capital of Oslo
100% of assault breaks between strangers
were committed by immigrant non-western males
and nine out of ten of their victims were native Norwegian women.
They're taking this gay pride march
through a predominantly Muslim neighborhood here in Stockholm
and there are fears that it could stoke tensions between
some of the local residents and the people demonstrating here.
Mostly provocation.
Is there propagation against the Muslim population here?
May Allah make it difficult on their women!
Allah gives victory to Islam everywhere!
Basically the U.S. is providing these flows for us,
"you make war and we get refugees", so...
The United Nations report says Sweden will be a third world nation
in about 15 years, below Libya and Bulgaria.
This is my country, this is your country,
I am so happy to share it with you!
My country is yours! My country belongs to you!
For there is no other path to victory,
except through sacrifice
and Jihad for the sake of Allah.
Swedes who disagree with that plan
risk being labeled racist, fascist, even Nazis.
This footage of the revolutionary front smashing the home of a suspected fascist
We're not even talking France, we're not talking Germany,
we are not talking Belgium or any of the other countries in the EU.
In the UK alone, we have 23,000 known Jihadists.
23,000.
That is larger than some portions of our military.
We basically have a foreign military in our lands
as a consequence of this immigration policy.
And our politicians continue to welcome
tens of millions of Muslims into our country.
Our politicians are directly endangering the citizens of our countries.
At the very least, this is extreme negligence.
At worst, this is pure treason.
We cannot stand for this. We cannot let this happen.
We need to close our borders.
We need to have the military on our borders guarding our borders now.
Yes, but you also have a declining birthrate
and you need, for a flourishing economy, you need some growth.
And... It has to be replaced by migrants from outside.
I believe in breaking down borders. I believe in European integration.
I was part of the 1992 process that removed borders.
Our society will change.
Our city will change radically.
I hold that in 20, 30 years
there will no longer be [German] majority in our city.
And I want to make it very clear, especially towards those right wingers:
This is a good thing!
this is Greece
this is England
this is France
this is Germany
this is France
this is England
this is Belgium
this is Sweden
this is Bulgaria
this is Greece
this is France
this is the Netherlands
this is Germany
this is Norway
this is Denmark
this is Europe
this was Europe
Goyim are mentally inferior to Jews and can't run their nations properly.
For their sake and ours, we need to abolish their governments
and replace them with a single government.
This will take a long time and involve much bloodshed,
but it's for a good cause.
Here's what we'll need to do:
Place our agents and helpers everywhere.
Take control of the media and use it in propaganda for our plans.
Start fight between different races, classes and religions.
Use bribery, threats and blackmail to get our way.
Use free Masonic lodges to attract potential public officials.
Appeal to successful people's egos.
Appoint public leaders who can be controlled by blackmail.
Replace royal rule with socialist rule, then communism, then despotism.
Abolish all rights and freedoms, except the right of force by us.
Sacrifice people (including Jews sometimes) when necessary.
Eliminate religion, replace it with science and materialism.
Control the education system to spread deception and destroy intellect.
Rewrite history to our benefit.
Create entertaining distractions.
Corrupt minds with filth and perversion.
Encourage people to spy on one another.
Keep the masses in poverty and perpetual labor.
Take possession of all true wealth, property and (especially) gold.
Use gold to manipulate the markets, cause depressions, etc.
Introduce a progressive tax on wealth.
Replace sound investment with speculation.
Make long-term interest-bearing loans to governments.
Give bad advice to governments and everyone else.
Eventually, the Goyim will be so angry with their governments,
because we'll blame them for the resulting mess,
that they'll gladly have us take over.
We will then appoint a descendant of David to be the king of the world,
and the remaining Goyim will bow down and sing his praises.
Everyone will live in peace and obedient order under his glorious rule.
THE JEWISH WORLD ORDER
Judaism is a plan for a world with no countries, only one border,
one that separates Jews from Gentiles.
Judaism's plan is a bi-level world (the communist template),
with "God's chosen people" living in paradise where no one has to work,
and with gentiles inexorably trapped in a lower world
which is a hell on Earth, where we exist as slaves, cattle for Jews.
The Jews' plan to create this bi-level world is described in explicit detail
in the Zohar, one of the "holiest" (it's pure evil, of course) books of Judaism.
This plan is exposed to the world in
"Jewish history, Jewish Religion," by Israel Shahak.
Often when there is dissent expressed in the United States
against policies of the Israeli government,
people here are called anti-Semitic.
What is your response to that as an Israeli Jew?
Well, it's a trick, we always use it.
When from Europe somebody is criticizing Israel,
then we bring out the Holocaust.
When in this country people are criticizing Israel,
then they are anti-Semitic.
And the organization is strong, and has a lot of money,
and the ties between Israel and the American Jewish establishment
are very strong and they are strong in this country, as you know.
And they have power, which is ok.
They are talented people and they have power and money,
and the media and other things,
and their attitude is "Israel, my country, right or wrong" identification.
And they are not ready to hear criticism.
And it's very easy to blame people who criticize
certain acts of the Israeli government as anti-Semitic,
and to bring out the Holocaust, and the suffering of the Jewish people,
and that justify everything we do to the Palestinians.
Through the implementation of the Federal Reserve System,
the government has become vested in these bankers,
and they get their money from the bankers, and so...
then they impose a tax on us, which makes us more slaves,
and makes it more difficult for us to survive, right?
Giving them more profits.
And now what's happened is that, through the Federal Reserve System,
the bankers have pretty much taken control of our government,
it doesn't matter Republican and Democrat anymore,
because they're both the same.
Neither one of them are talking about shutting down the Federal Reserve System,
or stopping the payment of taxes, you know,
or any of the big issues that face Americans.
So, I had a friend, Nick Rockefeller, who was one of the Rockefeller family.
And he... when I was running for governor in Nevada, he came to me,
introduced himself through an attorney, and we became friends.
We started talking about things. And...
I learned an awful lot from Mr. Rockefeller.
And one of the things that we used to talk about
was the ultimate plan of the banking industry...
what they wanted to accomplish.
And the goals of the banking industry, not just the Federal Reserve System,
but the private banks in Germany, and England, and Italy,
all over the world, they all work together, they're all central banks.
And they're all a part of the Communist Manifesto.
Central banking is one of the major planks of the Communist Manifesto.
You talk about America being a capitalistic country,
but, yet, at the same time, we have a central bank
that plans everything for us.
And the graduated income tax is another plank of the Communist Manifesto, right?
So, right there you have two major planks of the Communist Manifesto
that have been brought in because of the Federal Reserve System.
So, the ultimate goal that these people have in mind
is the goal to create a one-world government,
run by the banking industry, run by the bankers.
And they're doing it in sections,
the European currency, the euro, and the European Constitution.
That's one part of it.
Now they're trying to do it in America with the North American Union.
And they want to create a new currency called the "amero".
And the whole agenda is to create a one-world government
where everybody has an RFID chip implanted in them.
All money is to be in those chips... there'll be no more cash.
And this is given me straight from Rockefeller himself;
this is what they want to accomplish.
And all money will be in your chips.
And so, instead of having cash, any time you have money in your chip,
they can take out whatever they want to take out whenever they want to.
If they say "you owe us this much money in taxes,"
they just deduct it out of your chip, digitally.
- Total control. - Total control.
And, if you're like me or you, and you're protesting what they're doing,
they can just turn off your chip. And you have nothing.
You can't buy food... you can't do anything.
It's total control of the people.
And that chip's connected to a database that has your purchasing records,
- what you do... - Everything! Everything is in there, you know.
And so, they want a one-world government, controlled by them,
everybody being chipped, all your money in those chips,
and they control the chips! And they control people and you become a slave,
you become a serf to these people.
That's their goal, that's their intentions.
All of what we can see happening in the world is part of greater plans
called the Agenda 21, Agenda 2030 and Vision 2050.
These are the United Nations plans
to depopulate the planet from 7.5 billion down to 500 million
and then rule humanity under a communist one-world government in the year 2030.
This is what the globalists want.
A world government will give the globalists absolute control
over all of the world's resources and population.
Out of these troubled times our fifth objective –
a new world order – can emerge and today that new world is struggling to be born.
A world quite different from the one we've known,
a world where rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle.
The opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations,
a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle,
governs the conduct of nations.
When we are successful – and we will be – we have a real chance
at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations
can use its peacekeeping role
to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders.
What is at stake is more than one small country.
It is a big idea, a new world order,
where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause
to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind.
And that's why I wanted to speak to you today
about the new world taking shape around us,
about the prospects for a new world order now within our reach.
In the coming weeks, I'll be talking in some detail about the possibility
of a new world order emerging after the Cold War,
but today I want to discuss another aspect of that order.
You see, as the Cold War drew to an end
we saw the possibilities of a new order in which nations work together.
It refers to new ways of working with other nations to deter aggression
and to achieve stability.
As old threats recede, new threats emerge.
The quest for the New World Order is in part a challenge
to keep the dangers of disorder at bay.
We must build on the successes of Desert Storm
to give new shape and momentum to this new world order.
Only when this transformation is complete
will we be able to take full measure of the opportunities presented
by this new and involving world order.
AGENDA 2030
But it is the awareness itself that will drive the change.
And one of the ways it will drive the change
is through global governance and global agreements.
Now, much has been said by the Secretary of State and others
about a new world order, about a defining moment in history.
I have no doubt about the potential of this moment
to be defining in terms of history,
but that definition could be negative as well as positive.
And how negative or positive it will be will depend
on what kind of new world order we really create.
Never before has a new world order had to be assembled
from so many different perceptions, or on so global a scale.
The great seal of the United States.
And that great seal of the United States has on it:
Novus Ordo Seclorum,
a new order for the centuries, for the ages, forever.
There is a chance for the President of the United States
to use this disaster to carry out what his father, a phrase his father used
I think only once and hasn't been used since, and that is the New World Order.
During the conflict with Saddam Hussein ???
he kept talking about New World Order.
And then President Bush, at the end of that war (?)
describing that New World Order and what America's role is going to be in it.
turned out he gave one of those addresses ?? something else
This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful
and interdependent world order might be built,
will not be here or open for too long.
It's past the point of talking.
We know historically that the global governance...
sort of agenda to these issues is very hard to try…
with all the best intentions, it's very hard to actually activate.
We're seeing that right now,
we're seeing a lot of fragmentation going on in Copenhagen.
A lot of different agendas pulling in different directions.
These measures are enacted. We continue to move forward with the G20 process.
We will have the kind of global government,
governance that is necessary
to ensure the stability and transparency of markets
in a way that gives us the benefits
of the globalized market economy without the enormous risks that...
... people, they were bombed and I was just target like them
and as elected president official in charge of their protection,
I couldn't do anything about it, but the point here is
it's not about me, it's about the idea of freedom.
It's about the future of the whole region.
It's about the future (?) of Europe and a new world order.
The transatlantic partnership was never just the foundation about security.
It was the foundation of our way of life.
It was forged in experience of the most bitter and anguished kind.
Out of it came a new Europe, a new world order,
a new consensus as to how life should and could be lived.
The pieces are in flux, soon they will settle again.
Before they do, let us reorder this world around us.
I think the new world order is emerging and with it
the foundations of a new and progressive era of international cooperation.
We have resolved that from today
we will together manage the process of globalization
to secure responsibility from all and fairness to all.
And we have agreed that in doing so
we will build a more sustainable and more open and a fairer global society.
...realizes what I believe is our destiny
of success in this new world order.
So, in conclusion, ladies and gentlemen, a new world is emerging.
It is a new world order with significantly different
and radically new challenges...
Maybe some people dreamt of at the conference back in Bournemouth
when it looked as if maybe history would end,
that Liberal democracy would triumph,
that free market economics would slowly progress
and we would have a new world order...
Ted, what do you think America's place in the new world order should be?
It's always been seen as the global policeman.
But as you said before, it's hard to see with all these military conflicts
where the winner and loser lies. What should America be doing?
I think the global policeman should be the United Nations.
What sort of financial deal should Obama be seeking to strike
when he travels to China next month?
You know, I think this would be the time,
because you really need to bring China into the creation of a New World Order.
Financial World Order.
What do you think the most important thing is for Barack Obama?
Obviously you are here to talk about
the anniversary for US-China diplomatic relations
but if you had to say this is going to be the country,
or the conflict or the place that would define the Obama administration,
what would it be?
The President-elect is coming into office at a moment
when there are upheavals in many parts of the world simultaneously.
You have India-Pakistan. You have a jihadist movement.
So he can't really say that it's one problem, that is the most important one.
But he can give new impetus to American foreign policy,
partly because the ascension of him is so extraordinary and admirable.
I think his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America
in this period, when really a "New World Order" can be created.
It's a great opportunity. It isn't such a crisis.
There's a need for a new world order,
but it has different characteristics
in different parts of the world.
The affirmative task we have now is to actually create a new world order,
because the global order is changing again.
And the institutions of the world that worked so well
in the post-World War II era for decades they need to be strengthened.
So, let's leave them something to think about as they go home.
Let them go home and say
"Mr. Soros said here are three things we can do, simply." One?
Well, deal with the mortgage problem.
Reduce foreclosures.
Recapitalize the banks.
And then work on a better world order
where we work together to resolve problems
that confront humanity like global warming.
At its core, Agenda 21 is about control.
Control over land, natural resources and entire populations.
It seeks to control the air by regulation of carbon emissions,
the ground by 'sustainable development'
and the sea through environmental regulations.
Officially stated, Agenda 21 is
"A comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally
by organizations of the United Nations system, governments
and major groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment."
Because being human will always have an impact on the environment
Agenda 21 paves the way for extraordinary UN control.
When you boil it down, there are nine basic tenets of Agenda 21:
Move citizens off private land and into urban housing
Create vast wilderness spaces inhabited by large carnivores.
Eliminate cars and create "walkable" cities.
Support chosen private businesses with public funds for
"sustainable development."
Make policy decisions that favor the 'greater good' over individuals.
Drastically reduce the use of power, water,
and anything else that creates "carbon pollution."
Use bureaucracies to make sweeping decisions
outside of democratic processes.
Increase taxes, fees and regulations.
And finally,
implement policies meant to incentivize a reduced population.
The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about 9 billion.
Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%.
Controlling our every impact on the environment
means controlling every aspect of our lives.
What we eat, how we travel, where we live, how we live,
But NO is still an option.
Let me say one thing about choice. There is no real choice.
They say freedom of choice. You're given an illusion of choice.
Americans are meant to feel free by the exercise of meaningless choices.
And we will make America great again!
And when we do, America will be greater than ever.
But here in America, where is supposed to be free choice, there's less choice.
If Americans ever come to the conclusion
that there's not much difference between Republican and Democrats,
and they never include alternative choices in the coverage,
the Americans really aren't exposed to a true choice,
so we really have to fight.
Former CIA operative, head of the Bin Laden tracking unit, Michael Scheuer.
Michael, both the British and the United States,
I have, reportedly, made it very clear to Israel
they would prefer that there be no military action taken.
What are your thoughts?
Well, we're, at least in the United States, we're pretty helpless.
If the Israelis attack Iran;
the power of AIPAC in the lobby here, they own the Congress,
will lead to our support for whatever the Israelis do, I think.
Well, every candidate for Congress at that time had a pledge.
They were given a pledge to sign.
And I was new on the scene and so,
the pledge had Jerusalem as the capital city...
The eternal capital of the Jewish people, Jerusalem.
the military superiority of Israel...
American Congress people have to sign this pledge?
Yes, you sign the pledge. If you don't sign the pledge,
you do not get money... So, for example,
it was almost like a water torture for me. My parents observed this.
I would get a call and the person on the other end of the phone would say
"I want to do a fundraiser for you."
And then we would get into the planning, I would get really excited,
because, of course, you have to have money in order to run a campaign.
And then two weeks, three weeks into the planning
they would say "did you sign the pledge?"
and then I would say "no, I didn't sign the pledge."
And then my fundraiser would go kaput.
I am saying this to you right now.
Israel gets approximately
15 billion dollars a year from the American taxpayers.
That 15 billion is 30,000 dollars for every man, woman, and child.
People in my district are losing their pension benefits.
And I can't understand this why no one in Congress is raising their voice.
And the reason is very simple.
This may be you don't wanna hear, I don't know.
And I certainly don't want to hurt you on your show.
You have one of the best. You're fair.
But I believe that Israel has a powerful stranglehold
on the American government.
They control both members of the House - the House and the Senate.
They have us involved in wars in which we have little or no interest.
Our children are coming back in body bags.
Our nation is bankrupt over these wars.
And if you open your mouth, you get targeted.
If they don't beat you at the poll, they'll put you in prison.
They're controlling much of our foreign policy.
They're influencing much of our domestic policy.
Wolfowitz, as Undersecretary of Defense, manipulated
president Bush number 2 back into Iraq.
They pushed definitely to try and get Bush before he left to move into Iran.
We're conducting expansionist policy of Israel and everybody's afraid to say it.
They control much of the media,
they control much of the commerce of the country
and they control powerfully both bodies of the Congress.
They own the Congress.
Are you an anti-Semite?
No, I'm not and that's exactly what they're going to say and I expect that.
What I am is an American and, you see, I think America comes first.
And we have a one-sided foreign policy in the Mideast
and we've alienated Arabs who have no way of fighting,
so what they've done, and I predicted this on the House floor,
is they would export violence to America. And they have.
They have no other way to fight.
Greta, I'm saying this:
America is in danger.
If America doesn't take back their government without foreign influence...
I went into the State Department Near East section,
and found there was not one single Palestinian,
not one single Muslim, religious...
Saudi, you know, Jordanian...
not one Christian protestant, not one Roman Catholic.
Not one plain old American, whatever, from Cornpoke.
Every single person in all of those offices
were either Zionist, Israelis, whatever.
And they had pictures all over the walls of Israel, Israel, Israel.
They had magazines, 'Israel Today', you know, I was given a copy of one.
And there were yarmulkes, you know, and the Israeli writing, in other words...
And I asked one of the women,
after having gone through about, you know, 4 or 5 of these offices,
I said... because I was pretending to want to know
where the Palestinian office was.
She said "well, we handle all of that."
We handle all of that.
And this is the State Department, the...
Near East, the part that handles Israel, Jordan, all of these...
- Egypt. - Yeah, the Near East section. Yeah.
- It was just totally dominated by... - Totally.
- Israeli? - Totally.
And at that time, the spokesman,
I can't remember his name, he was a Zionist,
the spokesman for the whole State Department.
I have the high privilege and distinct honor
of presenting to you the prime minister of Israel,
his Excellency Benjamin Netanyahu.
All bought and paid for
Boxer Tyson Fury: The world has gone mad.
There is no morals, there is no loyalty, there is no... Nothing.
Everyone just do what he can, listen to the government,
follow everybody like sheep, be brainwashed
by all the Zionist Jewish people. They own all the banks,
all papers, all the TV stations.
Be brainwashed by it all.
At a 1991 closed-door meeting of fellow internationalists,
billionaire and former CFR chairman David Rockefeller ROCKEFELLER'S 1991 LEAKED SPEECH
praised his media allies. WILL GIVE YOU CHILLS
But his confidence that his words would not leave the room was later broken.
"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time magazine
and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings
and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years.
It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world
if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity.
But the world is now more sophisticated
and prepared to march towards a world government."
These men aim to create a world system of financial control in private hands,
able to dominate the political system of each country
and the economy of the world as a whole.
In short, they seek total and quiet control
of the entire world.
But we have to put our money where our mouths are.
OBAMA GIVES FINAL ADDRESS TO UNITED NATIONS
And we can only realize the promise of this institution's founding,
to replace the ravages of war with cooperation,
if powerful nations like my own accept constraints.
Sometimes, I'm criticized in my own country
for professing a belief in international norms and multilateral institutions.
But I am convinced that, in the long run,
giving up some freedom of action,
not giving up our ability to protect ourselves or pursue our core interests,
but binding ourselves to international rules,
over the long term, enhances our security.
The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves. Vladimi Lenin
Out of all the groups, the most important one by a mile
was the English Defence League, British Freedom Party,
that was a serious, systematic, hugely funded effort,
by a section of the ruling elite, by this Zionist neocon clique,
to dominate, to simply take over nationalism and turn it into their tool,
to encourage the white working-class to go and fight their wars,
and so that, when the banking collapse comes,
people are looking in the wrong direction instead of the real culprits.
This party, we were approached, I was approached,
we were offered money from the United States
and all they wanted was two things.
They only wanted us to concentrate on Islam
– and I yield to no one in my criticism – of Islam and grooming.
I put my neck on the line,
many of you have put your neck on the line as well,
but it's not the only problem.
And they wanted us only to focus on that,
and that only came with one other thing.
They wanted us to drop our criticism of the banking system.
Those were the only two things we had to concentrate on;
talking about Muslims and we had to drop our criticism
of the international banking system.
1984 is, I believe, a quite terrifying masterpiece.
So terrifying, in fact, I don't think I should like to read another like it.
I am not absolutely dissatisfied with it.
I think it is a good idea, but the execution would have been better,
if I had not been under the influence of TB when I wrote it.
You once claimed that you have an ability to face unpleasant facts.
Is that what you demonstrated in 1984
by drawing an accurate portrait of the future?
I think that allowing for the book being after all a parody,
something like 1984 could actually happen.
This is the direction the world is going in at the present time.
In our world, there will be no emotions except
fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement.
The sex instinct will be eradicated.
There will be no loyalty, except loyalty to the party.
But always there will be the intoxication of power.
Always at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory,
the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless.
If you want a picture of the future,
imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.
The moral to be drawn from this dangerous nightmare situation
is a simple one:
don't let it happen.
It depends on you.